JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 23, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Guillermo Otalora Lozano

✓
Topic · hard data
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Los Articulos 92, 97, 118, 119, 232 Y 327 (Parciales) De La Ley 906 De 2004, Codigo De Procedimiento Penal. Impedimentos Del Procurador Y El Viceprocurador General De La Nacion Para Conceptuar En El Proceso De La Referencia. Acepta Los Impedimentos Formulados
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimento Del Procurador Y Viceprocurador General De La Nacion
  • Intervención en expedición de la norma acusada
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. ACEPTAR el impedimento presentado por el senor Procurador, doctor Edgardo Jose Maya Villazon, para emitir concepto de fondo respecto de la constitucionalidad de las normas acusadas de la Ley 906 de 2004.
  2. SEGUNDO. ACEPTAR el impedimento presentado por el senor Viceprocurador General de la Nacion, doctor Carlos Arturo Gomez Pavajeau, para emitir concepto de fondo respecto de la constitucionalidad de las normas acusadas de la Ley 906 de 2004.
  3. TERCERO. ORDENAR que, una vez levantada la suspension, por Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, se REMITA el expediente al despacho del senor Procurador General de la Nacion para que proceda a la designacion del funcionario que habra de rendir, dentro del termino que aun resta, el concepto de fondo al que hace referencia el articulo 278-5 de la Carta Politica.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.